Energy savings, audit pass-through, carbon reduction
— written into the contract
In the name of light, we deliver results
SOLACRED (scenario partner) and MeetCarbon (platform partner) form a joint delivery body and jointly commit to three layers of results: economic savings, regulatory compliance and carbon reduction. Tiered compensation is triggered if any layer is missed. Customer billing shifts from "buying things / hours / licenses" to "buying results".
Public-institution carbon work has entered the era of personal accountability
In April 2026 the General Offices of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council issued two coordinated documents on energy and carbon assessment, alongside the State Bureau of Public Institutions Document No. 28 and rising local accountability requirements. The cost of "no result" has shifted from reputational to material — score deductions, cadre accountability, formal rejections.
What public institutions are really afraid of
It's "we tried hard but still cannot prove it when the audit comes". Three forces compound this fear.
Tight budget
Energy retrofits and PV-storage-charging investments routinely run from millions to tens of millions of RMB upfront. Public budgets are tight and approval cycles are long. The traditional "large fiscal budget + one-shot tender + project-based delivery" model no longer matches the financial reality of public institutions.
Hard assessment
Annual assessments, conservation-type institution accreditation, energy-efficiency grading and reporting deadlines pile on top of each other. "Verifiable data" has become a hard constraint — manual entry and Excel spreadsheets cannot produce a traceable data lineage when third-party auditors come knocking.
Diffused responsibility
A single carbon project often involves three to five separate contracts: HVAC vendor, PV vendor, platform vendor, O&M vendor. Every party has signed and delivered against their own SOW — yet no single party owns the customer’s ultimate result.
RaaS vs. legacy models — putting "results" at the center of the contract
Legacy models each cover a piece of the puzzle; RaaS hands the entire final picture to the joint delivery body.
| EMC | SaaS | EPC | RaaS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billing basis | Energy-cost savings share | Software subscription | Engineering settlement | Three-layer result KPIs (econ + compliance + carbon) |
| Promise scope | Economic results only | Software availability only | Construction acceptance only | All results the customer needs |
| Risk allocation | ESCO bears savings risk | Customer bears usage risk | Customer bears operations risk | Joint body shares all three layers |
| Assessment binding | Not bound | Not bound | Not bound | Bound to provincial annual assessment |
| Compensation if missed | None | None | None | Tiered: rectify → deduct → refund → renewal credit |
| Customer upfront | Low | Medium | High | Zero or low (deferred against results) |
Two partners, one result chain
SOLACRED owns "physical reduction"; MeetCarbon owns "data attestation". The customer talks to a single joint coordinator and never has to ask "whose problem is this?".
- Retrofits + PV / Storage / Charging
- Long-term operations SLA
- Virtual power plant aggregation
- Carbon-asset operations
- MeetCarbon OS data foundation
- JS/T 303 / GB/T 46563 accounting
- Audit material vault
- XiaoYu dual-carbon AI
Three layers, all bound, any miss triggers compensation
Economic + Compliance + Carbon — the three layers form one annual result-bet attachment, third-party verifiable.
The most directly perceivable value layer for the customer, closest to traditional EMC. RaaS adds VPP and carbon-asset revenue as additional upside.
| KPI | Formula | Promise | Frequency | Verifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive energy savings rate | (baseline – current) / baseline | Govt office ≥15–25% / Schools ≥18–28% / Hospitals ≥8–15% / Venues ≥20–30% | Annual | Third-party energy audit |
| Energy cost YoY reduction | YoY after price normalization | ≥ 12–20% | Quarterly / Annual | Joint body + customer finance |
| VPP annual incremental revenue | DR + ancillary services + load spot | ≥ 0.5–3 RMB/m²/yr | Annual | Power exchange settlement |
| Carbon-asset incremental revenue | CCER + carbon inclusion + green certs | Tailored to resource potential | Annual | Registry-issued certificates |
Tiered compensation: rectify first, deduct next, refund last
Avoids one-shot refunds that incentivize the joint body to walk away. The customer reserves the right to terminate at any stage.
We make the scene work — built, run, reduced
Engineering + assets + operations + market — packaged with "self-correct or deduct" as the floor.
Retrofit + PV-storage-charging commitment
Based on seven engineering packages refined over the years (A rooftop PV / B HVAC & lighting / C steam-boiler heat-pump replacement / D envelope & ventilation / E storage & microgrid / F smart energy & metering / G green power & carbon inclusion). Savings shortfalls are made up at our cost.
- Flexible composition of packages A–G
- Baseline + boundary + algorithm + acceptance one-shot
- Warranty + degradation compensation
Long-term operations SLA
5–10-year trust period; pro operations team + on-site engineers + remote support hub. Monthly reviews + quarterly reconciliations + annual result statements; SLA deviations compensated per contract.
- On-site major fault: 4-hour arrival
- Remote alert acknowledgement: 30 min
- Monthly report by 5th working day
VPP & carbon-asset incremental revenue commitment
In Wuchang District we have delivered EMC + VPP aggregation across roughly 115 public institutions, proving the "cost-cut + market upside + flagship demo" trinity. VPP revenue is floor-guaranteed and shared from market proceeds — no extra customer outlay.
- Annual VPP floor + uncapped upside
- CCER / inclusion / green-cert filings on behalf
- No additional service fees
EMC upgraded to "floor + share + bet"
Traditional EMC is "save what you can". RaaS adds a layer of "if savings fall short, joint body compensates". The long-term binding pulls upstream care into design, equipment selection and operations.
- Year-1 savings rate floor
- From year 2 we make up the gap
- Persistent shortfalls trigger tiered compensation
We make the data hold up — clean, reportable, visible, audit-ready
Built around the four-layer MeetCarbon OS architecture; backed by SLAs and "audit-fail refund / credit" mechanisms.
MeetCarbon OS data-foundation SLA
Unified org / project / asset / meter / cadence / data-owner; ingestion of electricity, gas, heat, water, PV, storage, charging, building, ops sources into a traceable single source of truth.
- Monthly availability ≥ 99.5%
- Critical-meter capture ≥ 98%
- Real-time ingest latency ≤ 5 min
Accounting & efficiency-grading commitment
Engine pre-aligned to JS/T 303 and the State Bureau Public-Institution Carbon Accounting Guide; GB/T 46563—2025 efficiency grading as a module. When national standards change, MeetCarbon recomputes; the customer does not redo work.
- Scope 1+2 with optional Scope 3
- Configurable factor library + auto-recompute
- Historical versions retained for stable disclosure
Audit material vault — one-click export at audit time
Archive logic embedded in system & ops flow; structured retention of engineering ledgers, run logs, rectification records, third-party verification materials. One-click bundles for annual assessments, accreditations and audits.
- Bundle by project / region / time / owner
- Audit failure attributable to platform → contractual compensation
- Connected to national & WuTanTong reporting platforms
XiaoYu dual-carbon AI commitment
Frees people from repetitive computation and judgment. AI does not replace human accountability — it automates the "uncomputable / slow / unwriteable" parts.
- Energy forecast monthly MAPE ≤ 8%
- Anomaly alert accuracy ≥ 85%
- AI-generated content reviewed by humans before disclosure
Five implementation phases — every step locks evidence for the next KPI bet
Built on the white-paper five-phase roadmap, but every "process deliverable" is rewritten as "result-bet input evidence".
- ·Baseline audit report
- ·Three-layer KPI sandbox
- ·Business-model proposal
- ·Baseline confirmation (signed)
- ·Retrofit & PV/storage/charging acceptance materials
- ·Platform integration spec
- ·Master data dictionary
- ·Initial data-quality report
- ·Accounting logic & factor list
- ·Dashboards & alert config
- ·Pilot run report & validation
- ·Report inventory & samples
- ·Upper-tier platform integration notes
- ·Initial material vault
- ·Mock-audit records
- ·AI scenario guides
- ·AI effectiveness reports
- ·Monthly / quarterly operations reports
- ·Annual three-layer result statement
Five scenario-tailored RaaS packs
Different verticals differ materially — energy structure, flexible-load potential, retrofit headroom, audit pressure. Promises are configured per vertical, one-on-one.
Govt office complexes
Municipal / district / provincial offices, central-SOE HQ campuses
Heavy annual assessment; demo-creation tasks; savings concentrated in HVAC & lighting
Pack B (HVAC & lighting) + A (rooftop / canopy PV) + F (smart metering) + EMC + full MeetCarbon OS
Where we have already walked: SOLACRED × MeetCarbon real samples
RaaS is not a new invention — it is the recombination of already-proven chains under a "result-bet" logic.
Four steps from zero to long-term companion
We build the customer's carbon project into a long-term provable asset — SOLACRED × MeetCarbon are willing to bind to the same revenue and assessment chain as the customer.
Joint body provides free on-site audit: usage survey, savings potential, platform data assessment, assessment-requirement alignment.
Pick one building, one campus or one independent unit for POC; joint body invests in engineering and platform deployment, validating against the contracted KPIs.
Once POC validates KPI feasibility, sign master service contract + tripartite governance agreement + year-1 result-bet annex; year-end review against the three layers.
Enter long-term operations trust; rolling annual review; annex renegotiable; flexibly adjust scope to business changes.
Hand "results" to a joint body willing to own them
No result, we share the burden. Result delivered, we share the gains.
We recommend kicking off planning at least 6 months before the provincial annual assessment node.